https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462703 The Uttarakhand HC addressed a delay condonation application in an eviction case involving recovery of rent arrears. The court found that counsel had engaged in professional misconduct by providing false information to the client, including claims of filing cases, obtaining stay orders, and filing before executing courts when no such actions had occurred. The HC took suo moto cognizance and directed the Registrar General to refer the matter to the Uttarakhand Bar Council for disciplinary proceedings against the counsel within six months, with a requirement to report back the decision. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:20:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462703 The Uttarakhand HC addressed a delay condonation application in an eviction case involving recovery of rent arrears. The court found that counsel had engaged in professional misconduct by providing false information to the client, including claims of filing cases, obtaining stay orders, and filing before executing courts when no such actions had occurred. The HC took suo moto cognizance and directed the Registrar General to refer the matter to the Uttarakhand Bar Council for disciplinary proceedings against the counsel within six months, with a requirement to report back the decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462703