<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1472 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462707</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal challenging adverse observations made by the HC of Uttarakhand. The court held that all courts, including the highest court, are bound by principles of natural justice and nobody can be condemned unheard. The HC&#039;s approach of making observations against the appellant without providing an opportunity to be heard was deemed legally unsustainable. The appeal was allowed based on violation of natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1472 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462707</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal challenging adverse observations made by the HC of Uttarakhand. The court held that all courts, including the highest court, are bound by principles of natural justice and nobody can be condemned unheard. The HC&#039;s approach of making observations against the appellant without providing an opportunity to be heard was deemed legally unsustainable. The appeal was allowed based on violation of natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>