<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44985</link>
    <description>The court upheld the challenge to the constitutional validity of Notification No. 49/89-Customs, directing the respondents to refund excess customs duty paid by petitioners due to the settlement reducing duty from 30% to 15% ad valorem. The court emphasized the economic impact on the newspaper industry and ordered the refund without requiring an affidavit for &#039;unjust enrichment&#039;. However, the court denied entitlement to interest on the refund, citing the settlement nature of the matter. Bank guarantees for duty exceeding 15% ad valorem were discharged. The respondents were directed to refund excess customs duty within three months, with no costs to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44985</link>
      <description>The court upheld the challenge to the constitutional validity of Notification No. 49/89-Customs, directing the respondents to refund excess customs duty paid by petitioners due to the settlement reducing duty from 30% to 15% ad valorem. The court emphasized the economic impact on the newspaper industry and ordered the refund without requiring an affidavit for &#039;unjust enrichment&#039;. However, the court denied entitlement to interest on the refund, citing the settlement nature of the matter. Bank guarantees for duty exceeding 15% ad valorem were discharged. The respondents were directed to refund excess customs duty within three months, with no costs to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>