<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Confirms Depreciation on Leasehold Improvements, Upholds Rs. 4 Crore Addition to Sale Consideration Under Contract</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90334</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim depreciation on leasehold improvements, affirming that the test of ownership is satisfied in such cases. However, regarding the addition of Rs. 4 crores to the sale consideration on the sale of shares, the Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition. It held that the Rs. 4 crores was not a stipulated deduction under the contractual agreement, and the sale consideration was fixed at Rs. 16 crores without any provision for reduction by Rs. 4 crores. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and confirmed the addition made by the AO. Grounds of appeal raised by the revenue on this issue were allowed, resulting in partial acceptance of the revenue&#039;s appeal and partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Confirms Depreciation on Leasehold Improvements, Upholds Rs. 4 Crore Addition to Sale Consideration Under Contract</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90334</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim depreciation on leasehold improvements, affirming that the test of ownership is satisfied in such cases. However, regarding the addition of Rs. 4 crores to the sale consideration on the sale of shares, the Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition. It held that the Rs. 4 crores was not a stipulated deduction under the contractual agreement, and the sale consideration was fixed at Rs. 16 crores without any provision for reduction by Rs. 4 crores. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and confirmed the addition made by the AO. Grounds of appeal raised by the revenue on this issue were allowed, resulting in partial acceptance of the revenue&#039;s appeal and partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>