<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 553 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774485</link>
    <description>The Madras HC allowed the petition regarding simultaneous exemption benefits under TNVAT Act 2006 and CST Act 1956. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to exemption under TNVAT Act for interstate sales under CST Act, citing precedent where no contrary notification was issued under Section 8(5) of CST Act. The impugned proceedings dated 06.02.2020 in CST:886961/2013-2014 were set aside, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 553 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774485</link>
      <description>The Madras HC allowed the petition regarding simultaneous exemption benefits under TNVAT Act 2006 and CST Act 1956. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to exemption under TNVAT Act for interstate sales under CST Act, citing precedent where no contrary notification was issued under Section 8(5) of CST Act. The impugned proceedings dated 06.02.2020 in CST:886961/2013-2014 were set aside, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>