<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 570 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774502</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appellant bank&#039;s appeal regarding non-transfer of income tax refund amount during CIRP. The court held that tax refund received during CIRP belonged to corporate debtor and must be transferred to CIRP account maintained by resolution professional, despite appellant&#039;s claimed security interest under hypothecation deed. Bank&#039;s refusal to transfer funds and conditional transfer demands were rejected. NCLAT ruled adjudicating authority correctly ordered transfer and dismissed bank&#039;s recall application. Security interest realization remains subject to liquidator&#039;s examination under applicable law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 570 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774502</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appellant bank&#039;s appeal regarding non-transfer of income tax refund amount during CIRP. The court held that tax refund received during CIRP belonged to corporate debtor and must be transferred to CIRP account maintained by resolution professional, despite appellant&#039;s claimed security interest under hypothecation deed. Bank&#039;s refusal to transfer funds and conditional transfer demands were rejected. NCLAT ruled adjudicating authority correctly ordered transfer and dismissed bank&#039;s recall application. Security interest realization remains subject to liquidator&#039;s examination under applicable law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>