<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774513</link>
    <description>The HC quashed customs communications rejecting petitioner&#039;s self-sealing licence renewal application. The rejection was based on alleged contravention of Facility Circular No.15/2023 and wrongful availment of customs notification benefits. The court found the rejection violated principles of natural justice as no personal hearing was provided to the petitioner, who claimed to be a large solar module exporter with 50 years&#039; business experience and 10 years of existing licence history. The court directed respondents to reconsider the renewal application after affording personal hearing and considering petitioner&#039;s explanation on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774513</link>
      <description>The HC quashed customs communications rejecting petitioner&#039;s self-sealing licence renewal application. The rejection was based on alleged contravention of Facility Circular No.15/2023 and wrongful availment of customs notification benefits. The court found the rejection violated principles of natural justice as no personal hearing was provided to the petitioner, who claimed to be a large solar module exporter with 50 years&#039; business experience and 10 years of existing licence history. The court directed respondents to reconsider the renewal application after affording personal hearing and considering petitioner&#039;s explanation on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>