<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774525</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI-AT upheld the bank&#039;s accounting treatment: amortization of premium on HTM securities over holding period allowed and ground dismissed. Additions disallowing depreciation on investments, venture capital investments and MTM derivatives, inter-office adjustments, section 14A/Rule 8D adjustments, depreciation on goodwill and deduction under section 43B were rejected, findings favoring the assessee following earlier HC/SC precedents. Deduction under section 36(1)(viii) was allowed but remitted to the AO for quantification in accordance with prior directions. Overall the Tribunal ruled largely for the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774525</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI-AT upheld the bank&#039;s accounting treatment: amortization of premium on HTM securities over holding period allowed and ground dismissed. Additions disallowing depreciation on investments, venture capital investments and MTM derivatives, inter-office adjustments, section 14A/Rule 8D adjustments, depreciation on goodwill and deduction under section 43B were rejected, findings favoring the assessee following earlier HC/SC precedents. Deduction under section 36(1)(viii) was allowed but remitted to the AO for quantification in accordance with prior directions. Overall the Tribunal ruled largely for the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>