https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774529 ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and restored the matter to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication regarding rejection of Section 80G registration. The tribunal found that the assessee trust had been conducting charitable activities since 2007, and the application was filed due to system changes requiring approval every five years. The tribunal noted contradictory information in columns 27a and 27b regarding religious expenditure and determined that the assessee deserved an opportunity to defend their case before CIT(E) in accordance with law and principles of equity and justice. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:39:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774529 ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and restored the matter to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication regarding rejection of Section 80G registration. The tribunal found that the assessee trust had been conducting charitable activities since 2007, and the application was filed due to system changes requiring approval every five years. The tribunal noted contradictory information in columns 27a and 27b regarding religious expenditure and determined that the assessee deserved an opportunity to defend their case before CIT(E) in accordance with law and principles of equity and justice. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774529