https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44966 The revisional power under Section 35EE(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was construed on its plain language as unobstructed by the mere availability of a further appeal to the Tribunal. The Court found no legal basis to hold that an appellate remedy excluded statutory revision, and therefore treated the Central Government's revision as competent. It also found no error in the revisional order that would justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution, so writ relief was declined. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:24:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44966 The revisional power under Section 35EE(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was construed on its plain language as unobstructed by the mere availability of a further appeal to the Tribunal. The Court found no legal basis to hold that an appellate remedy excluded statutory revision, and therefore treated the Central Government's revision as competent. It also found no error in the revisional order that would justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution, so writ relief was declined. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44966