<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 610 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774542</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the petition and declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order quashing prosecution under sections 276B/278AA where institutions failed to deduct tax timely but subsequently deducted and remitted the tax; the delay was attributable to staff absence for maternity leave and was not wanton, having been rectified. The SC upheld the High Court&#039;s exercise of discretion under Article 136, while leaving any question of law open, and dismissed any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 610 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774542</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the petition and declined to interfere with the HC&#039;s order quashing prosecution under sections 276B/278AA where institutions failed to deduct tax timely but subsequently deducted and remitted the tax; the delay was attributable to staff absence for maternity leave and was not wanton, having been rectified. The SC upheld the High Court&#039;s exercise of discretion under Article 136, while leaving any question of law open, and dismissed any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>