<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 146 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44964</link>
    <description>The Court granted interim orders protecting the petitioners against coercive recovery actions until the next hearing date or until orders were passed on their applications for directions on pre-deposit and stay by the Commissioner of Appeals. The Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Delhi Zone, outlined measures to address the substantial backlog of appeals, including refraining from coercive measures for excise dues below a certain threshold and expediting cases with higher revenue stakes. The Court emphasized the importance of a consistent policy decision on recovery pending stay applications and disposed of the case based on the terms outlined in the respondents&#039; affidavit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 146 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44964</link>
      <description>The Court granted interim orders protecting the petitioners against coercive recovery actions until the next hearing date or until orders were passed on their applications for directions on pre-deposit and stay by the Commissioner of Appeals. The Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Delhi Zone, outlined measures to address the substantial backlog of appeals, including refraining from coercive measures for excise dues below a certain threshold and expediting cases with higher revenue stakes. The Court emphasized the importance of a consistent policy decision on recovery pending stay applications and disposed of the case based on the terms outlined in the respondents&#039; affidavit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>