https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462687 Revisional interference with an order framing charges is limited to cases of gross error, jurisdictional defect, or disregard of material evidence, and at the charge stage the court only asks whether the record discloses a strong suspicion. Applying that test, the dying declaration, prior complaints, and material indicating harassment, eviction, termination from employment, and a loan fraud taken in the deceased's name were sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of abetment of suicide and offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court was therefore not justified in discharging the accused, and the prosecution was permitted to proceed to trial. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 20:31:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462687 Revisional interference with an order framing charges is limited to cases of gross error, jurisdictional defect, or disregard of material evidence, and at the charge stage the court only asks whether the record discloses a strong suspicion. Applying that test, the dying declaration, prior complaints, and material indicating harassment, eviction, termination from employment, and a loan fraud taken in the deceased's name were sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of abetment of suicide and offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court was therefore not justified in discharging the accused, and the prosecution was permitted to proceed to trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462687