<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1504 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462696</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed the petition challenging an assessment order passed under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B. The court held that since the petitioner had an efficacious remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority, it was not appropriate to entertain the writ petition. The court emphasized that where an adequate alternative remedy exists, the writ jurisdiction should not be exercised. All pending applications were also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 20:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1504 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462696</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed the petition challenging an assessment order passed under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B. The court held that since the petitioner had an efficacious remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority, it was not appropriate to entertain the writ petition. The court emphasized that where an adequate alternative remedy exists, the writ jurisdiction should not be exercised. All pending applications were also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>