<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 28 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44959</link>
    <description>The SC disposed of the appeals by directing deposit of specified amounts by a fixed date. On compliance, the appeals would stand allowed and the writ petitions would be disposed of, with the appeals to be heard on merits. If the deposits were not made within time, the earlier orders would remain in force and the appeals would stand dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 28 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44959</link>
      <description>The SC disposed of the appeals by directing deposit of specified amounts by a fixed date. On compliance, the appeals would stand allowed and the writ petitions would be disposed of, with the appeals to be heard on merits. If the deposits were not made within time, the earlier orders would remain in force and the appeals would stand dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>