<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44956</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the respondents&#039; claim for interest at 18% on warehoused goods, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutionality of Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found the interest demand justified under the Act, emphasizing that interest is linked to duty payable, and if duty is exempted, no interest is due. The judgment did not award costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44956</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the respondents&#039; claim for interest at 18% on warehoused goods, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutionality of Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found the interest demand justified under the Act, emphasizing that interest is linked to duty payable, and if duty is exempted, no interest is due. The judgment did not award costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>