<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462673</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled that a trust violated section 13(3) by paying 18% interest on unsecured loans from specified persons, resulting in complete loss of exemption under sections 11, 12, and 13. While the tribunal dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals regarding unsecured loan additions and contractor advances (finding these were legitimate construction-related payments, not prohibited investments under section 11(5)), it allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the section 13 violation. Following jurisdictional HC precedent, the tribunal held that any single violation of trust provisions results in loss of entire exemption, making the trust&#039;s surplus taxable under normal Income Tax Act provisions rather than trust-specific sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462673</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled that a trust violated section 13(3) by paying 18% interest on unsecured loans from specified persons, resulting in complete loss of exemption under sections 11, 12, and 13. While the tribunal dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals regarding unsecured loan additions and contractor advances (finding these were legitimate construction-related payments, not prohibited investments under section 11(5)), it allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the section 13 violation. Following jurisdictional HC precedent, the tribunal held that any single violation of trust provisions results in loss of entire exemption, making the trust&#039;s surplus taxable under normal Income Tax Act provisions rather than trust-specific sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>