https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44949 The Court denied the stay application, ruling that the Revenue Intelligence Department can detain goods to prevent duty evasion even after duty payment. The Court found that the departmental authorities acted within statutory provisions and rejected the appellant's argument that the Intelligence Department lacked jurisdiction. As the Trial Judge had already given specific instructions to complete necessary steps, the Court saw no grounds for a stay of judgment or halting proceedings. No costs were awarded, and all parties were directed to comply with the Court's order. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:13:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44949 The Court denied the stay application, ruling that the Revenue Intelligence Department can detain goods to prevent duty evasion even after duty payment. The Court found that the departmental authorities acted within statutory provisions and rejected the appellant's argument that the Intelligence Department lacked jurisdiction. As the Trial Judge had already given specific instructions to complete necessary steps, the Court saw no grounds for a stay of judgment or halting proceedings. No costs were awarded, and all parties were directed to comply with the Court's order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44949