<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1428 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462675</link>
    <description>Non-filing of Form 10CCB with the return was treated as a procedural lapse and not a substantive defect, so it could not by itself defeat the deduction claim where the underlying entitlement was otherwise established. The court accepted that a mere irregularity in furnishing the audit report does not justify denial of deduction under Section 80-IC, and the assessee&#039;s claim was allowed to stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1428 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462675</link>
      <description>Non-filing of Form 10CCB with the return was treated as a procedural lapse and not a substantive defect, so it could not by itself defeat the deduction claim where the underlying entitlement was otherwise established. The court accepted that a mere irregularity in furnishing the audit report does not justify denial of deduction under Section 80-IC, and the assessee&#039;s claim was allowed to stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>