<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 475 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774407</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed appeal against acquittal under Section 138 NI Act. Accused admitted executing cheque but raised probable defence claiming repayment of entire amount through mother&#039;s account statement. Court held that once probable defence is established, presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act no longer favour complainant. Since complainant failed to prove separate debt existence and appellate court found no perversity in trial court&#039;s evidence appreciation, acquittal was upheld. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 475 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774407</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed appeal against acquittal under Section 138 NI Act. Accused admitted executing cheque but raised probable defence claiming repayment of entire amount through mother&#039;s account statement. Court held that once probable defence is established, presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act no longer favour complainant. Since complainant failed to prove separate debt existence and appellate court found no perversity in trial court&#039;s evidence appreciation, acquittal was upheld. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>