https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774417 A criminal court cannot recall its own earlier order where the statute bars alteration of a judgment or order, so the later recall was impermissible. The Court also linked access to prosecution documents relied upon for trial to the accused's Article 21 fair-trial rights, but distinguished the charge stage from the defence stage. It held that production of such documents may be sought at the defence stage, not as a matter of right at the charge stage. The revision succeeded, the impugned order was set aside, and the accused's ability to seek the documents at the defence stage was preserved. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774417 A criminal court cannot recall its own earlier order where the statute bars alteration of a judgment or order, so the later recall was impermissible. The Court also linked access to prosecution documents relied upon for trial to the accused's Article 21 fair-trial rights, but distinguished the charge stage from the defence stage. It held that production of such documents may be sought at the defence stage, not as a matter of right at the charge stage. The revision succeeded, the impugned order was set aside, and the accused's ability to seek the documents at the defence stage was preserved. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774417