<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 489 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774421</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned entitlement to retain possession of the hotel property &quot;MB International&quot; after expiry of the six-year conducting agreement dated 03.07.2017. NCLAT held that the agreement had expired on 07.08.2023, after which the appellant had no lawful right to remain in possession and was liable to eviction. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with that order and disposed of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:53:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 489 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774421</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned entitlement to retain possession of the hotel property &quot;MB International&quot; after expiry of the six-year conducting agreement dated 03.07.2017. NCLAT held that the agreement had expired on 07.08.2023, after which the appellant had no lawful right to remain in possession and was liable to eviction. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with that order and disposed of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>