https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774454 Gujarat HC allowed the petition challenging an assessment order for A.Y. 2015-16. The AO passed the impugned order dated 28.03.2022 without proper notice for reopening assessment for that year, as the original notice was corrected via corrigendum to apply to A.Y. 2016-17. Additionally, the AO failed to provide opportunity of hearing under section 144B(6)(vii) despite petitioner's request on 24.03.2022. The court remanded the matter to AO for fresh de novo order after providing hearing opportunity for A.Y. 2016-17, allowing petitioner to raise all legal contentions. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774454 Gujarat HC allowed the petition challenging an assessment order for A.Y. 2015-16. The AO passed the impugned order dated 28.03.2022 without proper notice for reopening assessment for that year, as the original notice was corrected via corrigendum to apply to A.Y. 2016-17. Additionally, the AO failed to provide opportunity of hearing under section 144B(6)(vii) despite petitioner's request on 24.03.2022. The court remanded the matter to AO for fresh de novo order after providing hearing opportunity for A.Y. 2016-17, allowing petitioner to raise all legal contentions. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774454