https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774455 The Madras HC set aside assessment orders dated 29.03.2025 after finding that the respondent failed to provide adequate opportunity to the petitioner to file their reply. The respondent issued show cause notices on 24.03.2025 and 28.03.2025 allowing only two days and one day respectively for responses, citing limitation concerns as orders needed to be passed by 31.03.2025. The HC rejected this justification, noting that if limitation was genuinely a concern, proceedings should have commenced earlier. The court found fault in the decision-making process and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs and file their reply within six weeks. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774455 The Madras HC set aside assessment orders dated 29.03.2025 after finding that the respondent failed to provide adequate opportunity to the petitioner to file their reply. The respondent issued show cause notices on 24.03.2025 and 28.03.2025 allowing only two days and one day respectively for responses, citing limitation concerns as orders needed to be passed by 31.03.2025. The HC rejected this justification, noting that if limitation was genuinely a concern, proceedings should have commenced earlier. The court found fault in the decision-making process and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs and file their reply within six weeks. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774455