<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 551 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774483</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and restored the writ petition to the High Court for fresh adjudication in light of M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd. The Court noted the respondents&#039; objection based on a proposed retrospective amendment, but that amendment had not yet been enacted. The matter was therefore remanded so the High Court could decide the writ petition in accordance with the governing precedent and the relevant observations in that decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:50:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 551 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774483</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and restored the writ petition to the High Court for fresh adjudication in light of M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd. The Court noted the respondents&#039; objection based on a proposed retrospective amendment, but that amendment had not yet been enacted. The matter was therefore remanded so the High Court could decide the writ petition in accordance with the governing precedent and the relevant observations in that decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>