<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44930</link>
    <description>In a job-work footwear manufacture arrangement, the liability to central excise duty turned on the identity of the &quot;manufacturer&quot; under the amended definition and later legal developments. The Court held that the issue could not be finally resolved on the Tribunal&#039;s existing record because subsequent decisions had materially changed the legal position, and any fresh examination should consider existing and, if needed, additional evidence. It directed that the Tribunal, rather than the Assistant Commissioner, should conduct the reconsideration. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44930</link>
      <description>In a job-work footwear manufacture arrangement, the liability to central excise duty turned on the identity of the &quot;manufacturer&quot; under the amended definition and later legal developments. The Court held that the issue could not be finally resolved on the Tribunal&#039;s existing record because subsequent decisions had materially changed the legal position, and any fresh examination should consider existing and, if needed, additional evidence. It directed that the Tribunal, rather than the Assistant Commissioner, should conduct the reconsideration. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>