<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 128 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44927</link>
    <description>Writ petitions were dismissed because the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory revision remedy under the Central Excise Act, 1944 before seeking further relief. The Court granted liberty to file the revision within the prescribed time, leaving the merits to be examined in that statutory forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:55:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 128 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44927</link>
      <description>Writ petitions were dismissed because the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory revision remedy under the Central Excise Act, 1944 before seeking further relief. The Court granted liberty to file the revision within the prescribed time, leaving the merits to be examined in that statutory forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>