https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44919 Recovery of excess rebate paid under Notification No. 132/82 was considered with reference to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court held that the Tribunal's order did not impose any restriction preventing the Revenue from pursuing remedies available under the General Law, and it should not be read as creating such a bar. The Revenue's appeals failed, but the availability of independent legal remedies was expressly preserved where no express statutory prohibition existed. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:35:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44919 Recovery of excess rebate paid under Notification No. 132/82 was considered with reference to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court held that the Tribunal's order did not impose any restriction preventing the Revenue from pursuing remedies available under the General Law, and it should not be read as creating such a bar. The Revenue's appeals failed, but the availability of independent legal remedies was expressly preserved where no express statutory prohibition existed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44919