<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (1) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462657</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a suit seeking declaration that disputed house property was debutter (trust) property and non-alienable. The property was originally dedicated to family idols in 1908 through a registered deed of endowment, but was revoked in 1910 by the donor and his mother (appointed shebait). The donor continued in adverse possession for over 12 years, paying municipal taxes and mortgaging the property multiple times. The HC held that while the original dedication was valid, the subsequent revocation and adverse possession by the donor for more than 12 years extinguished the trust&#039;s rights. The court ruled adverse possession can be acquired against idols and trust property, allowing the defendant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 11:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (1) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462657</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a suit seeking declaration that disputed house property was debutter (trust) property and non-alienable. The property was originally dedicated to family idols in 1908 through a registered deed of endowment, but was revoked in 1910 by the donor and his mother (appointed shebait). The donor continued in adverse possession for over 12 years, paying municipal taxes and mortgaging the property multiple times. The HC held that while the original dedication was valid, the subsequent revocation and adverse possession by the donor for more than 12 years extinguished the trust&#039;s rights. The court ruled adverse possession can be acquired against idols and trust property, allowing the defendant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>