<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1238 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462656</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal. For 2004-05, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs.10,12,500 on interest paid to directors/relatives, finding 18% rate reasonable for unsecured loans, but upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of gross profit addition to Rs.6,00,000 including work-in-progress. For 2005-06, the Tribunal reduced the interest disallowance by allowing 18% as reasonable rate instead of 15% determined by CIT(A), following precedent in Empire Motors case. The company engaged in dyeing and printing on job work basis successfully challenged excessive interest disallowances under section 40A(2)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 11:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1238 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462656</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal. For 2004-05, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs.10,12,500 on interest paid to directors/relatives, finding 18% rate reasonable for unsecured loans, but upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of gross profit addition to Rs.6,00,000 including work-in-progress. For 2005-06, the Tribunal reduced the interest disallowance by allowing 18% as reasonable rate instead of 15% determined by CIT(A), following precedent in Empire Motors case. The company engaged in dyeing and printing on job work basis successfully challenged excessive interest disallowances under section 40A(2)(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>