<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44912</link>
    <description>The court found that the search and seizure operations conducted by Customs officers at the petitioners&#039; premises were lawful under Section 105 of the Customs Act. Despite the petitioners&#039; argument that the search lacked proper documentation of reasons, the court deemed the information provided in the affidavit justified the search. The court refrained from assessing the sufficiency of the reasons to avoid prejudicing ongoing Customs proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the Customs officers, and no costs were awarded. The case solely revolved around the legality of the search and seizure under Section 105 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44912</link>
      <description>The court found that the search and seizure operations conducted by Customs officers at the petitioners&#039; premises were lawful under Section 105 of the Customs Act. Despite the petitioners&#039; argument that the search lacked proper documentation of reasons, the court deemed the information provided in the affidavit justified the search. The court refrained from assessing the sufficiency of the reasons to avoid prejudicing ongoing Customs proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the Customs officers, and no costs were awarded. The case solely revolved around the legality of the search and seizure under Section 105 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>