<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 415 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774347</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed appeals challenging provisional attachment orders under PMLA, 2002. The tribunal rejected appellant&#039;s contention that property attachment requires direct causal link between scheduled offence and attached property. The court found respondents established money trail from accused to appellant&#039;s partnership firm account, which funded acquisition of attached immovable property. With prosecution complaint already filed and cognizance taken by trial court, the tribunal held attachment serves as balancing arrangement to secure interests while ensuring proceeds of crime remain available. The tribunal concluded balance of interests favored continued attachment pending criminal trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 415 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774347</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed appeals challenging provisional attachment orders under PMLA, 2002. The tribunal rejected appellant&#039;s contention that property attachment requires direct causal link between scheduled offence and attached property. The court found respondents established money trail from accused to appellant&#039;s partnership firm account, which funded acquisition of attached immovable property. With prosecution complaint already filed and cognizance taken by trial court, the tribunal held attachment serves as balancing arrangement to secure interests while ensuring proceeds of crime remain available. The tribunal concluded balance of interests favored continued attachment pending criminal trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>