<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 435 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774367</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of a public charitable trust seeking registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G. CIT(E) had rejected the application, claiming the trust&#039;s electric vehicle rental activities were commercial in nature. The trust argued it promoted environmental sustainability through CSR initiatives by providing electric vehicles to marginalized communities at Rs 5000 monthly rent, transferring ownership after 3 years. ITAT held the activities were genuinely charitable, aimed at empowering disadvantaged sections without profit motive, and aligned with trust objectives. Following SC precedent in Surat Art Silk case, ITAT ruled that professional execution of charitable activities doesn&#039;t negate charitable status when profits serve charitable purposes exclusively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 435 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774367</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of a public charitable trust seeking registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G. CIT(E) had rejected the application, claiming the trust&#039;s electric vehicle rental activities were commercial in nature. The trust argued it promoted environmental sustainability through CSR initiatives by providing electric vehicles to marginalized communities at Rs 5000 monthly rent, transferring ownership after 3 years. ITAT held the activities were genuinely charitable, aimed at empowering disadvantaged sections without profit motive, and aligned with trust objectives. Following SC precedent in Surat Art Silk case, ITAT ruled that professional execution of charitable activities doesn&#039;t negate charitable status when profits serve charitable purposes exclusively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>