<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 446 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774378</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC held that issuing notices to petitioner&#039;s old email address after department was aware of changed email address violated principles of natural justice. Despite petitioner updating email to kctsilks@gmail.com in correspondence, department continued sending notices to previous address. Court found this denied petitioner fair opportunity to contest case and be heard. Impugned order was unsustainable due to improper notice and lack of fair hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 446 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774378</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC held that issuing notices to petitioner&#039;s old email address after department was aware of changed email address violated principles of natural justice. Despite petitioner updating email to kctsilks@gmail.com in correspondence, department continued sending notices to previous address. Court found this denied petitioner fair opportunity to contest case and be heard. Impugned order was unsustainable due to improper notice and lack of fair hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>