https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462647 A promoter cannot substitute a promised clubhouse and community facility with additional residential towers in a registered phase without the previous written consent of at least two-thirds of the allottees. The court treated the change as a substantive alteration of the sanctioned plan and common areas, falling within the statutory consent requirement. Contractual clauses allowing revision to meet legal requirements did not amount to informed consent for deleting promised amenities, and phased-project exemptions under the State Rules could not override the statutory protection. The revised approval was therefore invalid, and the original writ relief was restored. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 12:33:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462647 A promoter cannot substitute a promised clubhouse and community facility with additional residential towers in a registered phase without the previous written consent of at least two-thirds of the allottees. The court treated the change as a substantive alteration of the sanctioned plan and common areas, falling within the statutory consent requirement. Contractual clauses allowing revision to meet legal requirements did not amount to informed consent for deleting promised amenities, and phased-project exemptions under the State Rules could not override the statutory protection. The revised approval was therefore invalid, and the original writ relief was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462647