<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44887</link>
    <description>Charges separately recovered for erection, installation and commissioning at the customer&#039;s site after manufacture and supply of boilers do not form part of the assessable value for central excise duty. The Court applied the principle that post-manufacturing expenses and site installation activities are outside the scope of manufacture, so they cannot be added to the value of excisable goods. On that basis, the separate erection and commissioning charges were not liable to excise duty and were excluded from assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44887</link>
      <description>Charges separately recovered for erection, installation and commissioning at the customer&#039;s site after manufacture and supply of boilers do not form part of the assessable value for central excise duty. The Court applied the principle that post-manufacturing expenses and site installation activities are outside the scope of manufacture, so they cannot be added to the value of excisable goods. On that basis, the separate erection and commissioning charges were not liable to excise duty and were excluded from assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>