https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774292 CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding anti-dumping duty refund. The Appellate Authority had dismissed the refund claim as time-barred, but CESTAT found the refund application was filed on 28.06.2008, merely two months after the original order dated 23.04.2008, well within the six-month limitation period under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The cross objection was improperly dismissed despite containing valid grounds. CESTAT modified the order, setting aside the portion that denied the refund and restored the sanctioned anti-dumping duty refund. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 08:42:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774292 CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding anti-dumping duty refund. The Appellate Authority had dismissed the refund claim as time-barred, but CESTAT found the refund application was filed on 28.06.2008, merely two months after the original order dated 23.04.2008, well within the six-month limitation period under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The cross objection was improperly dismissed despite containing valid grounds. CESTAT modified the order, setting aside the portion that denied the refund and restored the sanctioned anti-dumping duty refund. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774292