<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 386 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774318</link>
    <description>Delhi HC quashed GST registration cancellation order dated 6 September 2024. During physical verification, taxpayer was found non-existent at principal place of business, leading to retrospective cancellation from 1 July 2017. Court relied on Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises precedent, holding that registration cancellation should be effective from show cause notice date rather than retrospectively. The final cancellation order could not be sustained and petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 08:42:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 386 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774318</link>
      <description>Delhi HC quashed GST registration cancellation order dated 6 September 2024. During physical verification, taxpayer was found non-existent at principal place of business, leading to retrospective cancellation from 1 July 2017. Court relied on Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises precedent, holding that registration cancellation should be effective from show cause notice date rather than retrospectively. The final cancellation order could not be sustained and petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>