https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774319 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition challenging an assessment order despite availability of statutory remedy. The court found the impugned order suffered from non-application of mind as it merely reiterated the proposal without addressing the petitioner's reply regarding Input Tax Credit claims. The court held that while alternative remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, exceptions exist including violation of natural justice principles and non-application of mind. The assessment order dated 02.09.2024 and consequential detailed order dated 31.08.2024 were set aside. Petition disposed of favorably. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 08:42:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774319 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition challenging an assessment order despite availability of statutory remedy. The court found the impugned order suffered from non-application of mind as it merely reiterated the proposal without addressing the petitioner's reply regarding Input Tax Credit claims. The court held that while alternative remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, exceptions exist including violation of natural justice principles and non-application of mind. The assessment order dated 02.09.2024 and consequential detailed order dated 31.08.2024 were set aside. Petition disposed of favorably. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774319