<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774323</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of a writ petition challenging an assessment order and consequential rectification order. The petitioner had filed a rectification petition under bonafide impression that issues could be rectified through that process. While the court noted nothing prevented filing an immediate appeal after the assessment order, in the interest of justice, it permitted the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority within four weeks, subject to depositing 10% of disputed tax over and above the statutory 10% deposit already required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 08:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774323</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of a writ petition challenging an assessment order and consequential rectification order. The petitioner had filed a rectification petition under bonafide impression that issues could be rectified through that process. While the court noted nothing prevented filing an immediate appeal after the assessment order, in the interest of justice, it permitted the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority within four weeks, subject to depositing 10% of disputed tax over and above the statutory 10% deposit already required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>