https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44877 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging excise orders on assessable value was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal remedy was available under the excise framework. The Court applied the settled principle that writ jurisdiction should not normally be invoked when a specific appellate forum exists for redress of the grievance, and held that the petitioners had not exhausted that remedy. The merits of the assessment and review orders were left open for determination by the appellate authority, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:59:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44877 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging excise orders on assessable value was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal remedy was available under the excise framework. The Court applied the settled principle that writ jurisdiction should not normally be invoked when a specific appellate forum exists for redress of the grievance, and held that the petitioners had not exhausted that remedy. The merits of the assessment and review orders were left open for determination by the appellate authority, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44877