<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 170 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44873</link>
    <description>Reclassification of goods raised the question whether differential duty could be recovered as short levy for a period preceding the show cause notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The matter concerned the permissible scope of duty recovery after reclassification and the treatment of pre-notice periods for differential duty demands. The appeal was not finally decided and was directed to be placed before the Hon&#039;ble CJI for orders on reference to a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 170 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44873</link>
      <description>Reclassification of goods raised the question whether differential duty could be recovered as short levy for a period preceding the show cause notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The matter concerned the permissible scope of duty recovery after reclassification and the treatment of pre-notice periods for differential duty demands. The appeal was not finally decided and was directed to be placed before the Hon&#039;ble CJI for orders on reference to a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>