<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44867</link>
    <description>A personal hearing on a pre-deposit waiver application is not always mandatory, but once a court has specifically directed the appellate authority to hear the application and the authority has itself fixed a hearing date, it cannot dispose of the matter ex parte without cogent reasons. Such departure breaches fair procedure and the binding effect of the earlier judicial direction. Orders directing pre-deposit, passed without an effective hearing in those circumstances, are unsustainable and liable to be quashed; the waiver applications must be reheard and decided afresh after personal hearing, with recovery stayed until that decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44867</link>
      <description>A personal hearing on a pre-deposit waiver application is not always mandatory, but once a court has specifically directed the appellate authority to hear the application and the authority has itself fixed a hearing date, it cannot dispose of the matter ex parte without cogent reasons. Such departure breaches fair procedure and the binding effect of the earlier judicial direction. Orders directing pre-deposit, passed without an effective hearing in those circumstances, are unsustainable and liable to be quashed; the waiver applications must be reheard and decided afresh after personal hearing, with recovery stayed until that decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>