<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1656 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462629</link>
    <description>Writ supervisory interference over consumer forum orders is confined to cases of jurisdictional defect, perversity, or breach of natural justice, and the writ court will not act as an appellate forum to reappreciate the merits. The document also states that the statutory time for filing a written statement under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is thirty days, extendable by no more than fifteen days, and that delay cannot be condoned on an unsubstantiated plea of incomplete service where complete documents were served. On those principles, the challenge to the revisional and delay-related orders was rejected and the refusal to accept the late written statement remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1656 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462629</link>
      <description>Writ supervisory interference over consumer forum orders is confined to cases of jurisdictional defect, perversity, or breach of natural justice, and the writ court will not act as an appellate forum to reappreciate the merits. The document also states that the statutory time for filing a written statement under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is thirty days, extendable by no more than fifteen days, and that delay cannot be condoned on an unsubstantiated plea of incomplete service where complete documents were served. On those principles, the challenge to the revisional and delay-related orders was rejected and the refusal to accept the late written statement remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>