<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT remits un-reconciled Vienna bank payments case for fresh assessment after forensic audit without proper rebuttal opportunity</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90158</link>
    <description>ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting additions towards un-reconciled payments from Vienna bank account and remitted matter to AO for fresh consideration. Tribunal found valid nexus between reopening reasons based on confession statement and escaped income, noting appellant&#039;s admission of Rs. 1230 crores understated liability. AO&#039;s additions were based on KPMG forensic audit report without providing copy to assessee for rebuttal. Since related company&#039;s assessment was set aside by High Court for considering re-casted books of accounts, and intra-group transactions would impact appellant&#039;s income, fresh assessment required after considering re-casted accounts and forensic audit findings. Both assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT remits un-reconciled Vienna bank payments case for fresh assessment after forensic audit without proper rebuttal opportunity</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90158</link>
      <description>ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting additions towards un-reconciled payments from Vienna bank account and remitted matter to AO for fresh consideration. Tribunal found valid nexus between reopening reasons based on confession statement and escaped income, noting appellant&#039;s admission of Rs. 1230 crores understated liability. AO&#039;s additions were based on KPMG forensic audit report without providing copy to assessee for rebuttal. Since related company&#039;s assessment was set aside by High Court for considering re-casted books of accounts, and intra-group transactions would impact appellant&#039;s income, fresh assessment required after considering re-casted accounts and forensic audit findings. Both assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>