<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774206</link>
    <description>Vicarious liability of a company director under Section 141(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act arises only where the complaint contains specific averments that the director was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business when the offence occurred; bare references to directorship or general assertions are insufficient. Undisputed public documents, including a resignation record filed with the Registrar of Companies, may be considered at the threshold in discharge or quashing proceedings. Where such documents show that the director had resigned before the cheque issuance, liability under Section 138 cannot be prima facie fastened, and the proceedings are not maintainable against that person.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774206</link>
      <description>Vicarious liability of a company director under Section 141(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act arises only where the complaint contains specific averments that the director was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business when the offence occurred; bare references to directorship or general assertions are insufficient. Undisputed public documents, including a resignation record filed with the Registrar of Companies, may be considered at the threshold in discharge or quashing proceedings. Where such documents show that the director had resigned before the cheque issuance, liability under Section 138 cannot be prima facie fastened, and the proceedings are not maintainable against that person.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>