<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 140 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44859</link>
    <description>Section 128(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 was construed as conferring a broad appellate power to pass such order as the authority deemed fit, including confirming, modifying or annulling the appealed decision. Because an order of remand necessarily sets aside the decision under appeal, that power was held to include remitting the matter for fresh adjudication. The objection to remand was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 140 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44859</link>
      <description>Section 128(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 was construed as conferring a broad appellate power to pass such order as the authority deemed fit, including confirming, modifying or annulling the appealed decision. Because an order of remand necessarily sets aside the decision under appeal, that power was held to include remitting the matter for fresh adjudication. The objection to remand was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>