<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 306 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774238</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the additions forming its basis have been deleted. A claim for expenses supported by an audit report, even if ultimately unsustainable, does not by itself establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) therefore fail when no underlying assessed addition remains and the claim is bona fide without evidence of concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 306 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774238</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the additions forming its basis have been deleted. A claim for expenses supported by an audit report, even if ultimately unsustainable, does not by itself establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) therefore fail when no underlying assessed addition remains and the claim is bona fide without evidence of concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>