https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774257 Interference with a bail order is confined to cases where the discretion was exercised perversely, illegally, arbitrarily or unjustifiably; cancellation of bail, by contrast, requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances. Applying that distinction, the court treated the challenge as one to the correctness of the bail order, found the allegations to rest mainly on documentary and electronic material, and noted no basis to treat the accused as a flight risk or likely to tamper with evidence. No misuse of liberty or supervening circumstance was shown, so the request to recall bail failed. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:47:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774257 Interference with a bail order is confined to cases where the discretion was exercised perversely, illegally, arbitrarily or unjustifiably; cancellation of bail, by contrast, requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances. Applying that distinction, the court treated the challenge as one to the correctness of the bail order, found the allegations to rest mainly on documentary and electronic material, and noted no basis to treat the accused as a flight risk or likely to tamper with evidence. No misuse of liberty or supervening circumstance was shown, so the request to recall bail failed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774257