https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44852 The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice but directed that the proposal to levy duty during an exemption period be considered redundant. It found the notice valid for the extended limitation period due to allegations of wilful suppression of facts. The court emphasized limited interference with statutory proceedings and dismissed the writ petition, instructing the petitioner to respond to the notice within four weeks. The respondents were ordered to expedite the matter's resolution within six months, with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 May 2016 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44852 The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice but directed that the proposal to levy duty during an exemption period be considered redundant. It found the notice valid for the extended limitation period due to allegations of wilful suppression of facts. The court emphasized limited interference with statutory proceedings and dismissed the writ petition, instructing the petitioner to respond to the notice within four weeks. The respondents were ordered to expedite the matter's resolution within six months, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44852